Last time I posted, I left you with an image that looks a bit like this:
Offhand, that might seem to not be a particularly optimistic chart to talk about when we're talking about Tender's revenue (at least from a profit perspective). There's a bit more data that we have up our sleeve that make us feel optimistic even about this potentially daunting chart.
Investment
Fortunately we have been in a position where our consulting work with various client have been able to subsidize our development of Tender (and it sister-application, Lighthouse). This has permitted us to build Tender without having to seek outside investment. And because of THAT, we don't have growth quotas, or quarterly profit requirements, or a fund chasing after us to build a sales team that outnumbers our product team (as a matter of fact, we have no sales team members, all of our team is dedicated to the development and support of our products).
Retention
In part because we have been free to set our own functional requirements without (too much) regard for quick profitability, we've been able to focus on making Tender not just a good customer support solution, but an application that keeps providing value over the years. That might sound like a lot of fluff, but consider this:

In this chart above, this shows the fraction of people who have ever been paying Tender customers that are still current paying customers. TL;DR: 63% of all customers from March 09 are still customers in March 2011. This works out over 24 months to be a less than 1.6% churn rate monthly. MBAs and business team folks in the audience can corroborate when I say anything under 2.5% is exceptionally low, when one can expect anywhere between 1% and 10% to be typical, we're pushing right up to the edge of extremely high retention.
Another thing that you can see from the chart above (if you had the original numbers) is the following stat. I'm going to put it in bold, because this is something we're especially proud of...
79.44% of all paying Tender customers, ever, are still with us.
This chart below shows the monthly growth rate of revenues, you've also probably seen this in the last blog post:
As you can see, after every large bump in revenues, we had a period about a month or so later where we experienced some decreases; when we have a large influx of new customers, we expect a certain number of them not to stay with us. But if you look closely at the January 2011 part of the graph, you might be able to see something unprecedented: A significant growth period (November-December 2010) followed by a month that did NOT exhibit negative growth. Not only are we making Tender a better application as fast as we reasonably can with our small team, we're doing a better job than ever of keeping our current customers.
Operating Margin
We have spent a lot of money on Tender since months before our public launch, and we consider all of that to be valuable investment in keeping our customers happy (nearly 4 in 5 of all Tender customers ever are still with us, if I may shamelessly repeat myself), but we have also been focusing on our team's makeup to focus on building new functionality for the product, and supporting our product with personal responses from everyone on the team (where each person's expertise lies). For the first 2 months ever during the development of Tender, we have been monthly positive on costs:
While we don't expect this to continue indefinitely (we still will be maximizing our investment in our product), we've been able to keep Tender growing organically and been able to keep ourselves free of external entanglements that could take our eye off the ball. With our focus on dev and support, we've been able to keep our customers happy enough that our retention and growth are both at fantastic levels.


5 Comments
Posts like these are great, thanks for sharing the trend and thoughts behind the development of the apps. It’s nice to read a view other than “pump and dump” startups these days or “all we do is Premium” 37signals-esque posts.
Our team of a couple dozen people (not tied to this email), are really getting great use from Lighthouse- it’s the first tool for ticket tracking we’ve used (of many) that has everyone pleased. It’s good for barely-web-savvy frontline staff all the way back to developers and management. Keep up the great work.
I’ve been with tender since late 2010 and am very pleased with the service. This post, if anything, makes me want to stick with you even more, because you’re in very much the same position as I am, and indeed many small businesses bootstrapping products organically are. Organically grown businesses may not get as many headlines as the high burn rate VC darlings, but IMO they’re much ore worthy of your trust, because they’re not trying to kid anyone, or simply gambling with other people’s money and may disappear or radically change business model in a heartbeat because of investor pressure.
So, great going guys. My Tender subs aren’t contributing that much to your bottom line in the grand scheme of things, but they’ll continue and I’ll keep telling people what a great job you’re doing. And you just made me consider moving my (currently local) internal dev issue tracker to Lighthouse…
Do you think you guys will move towards a product only model vs product + services?
it would appear that our support system and yours even are completely down. are you guys working on it?
Wow, thanks for sharing that data. There is just not a lot of data out when it comes to software as a service products. I always keep track of what data I can get to compared to our business performance. Every business is different but when I look at your charts compared to ours I can compare how well we are doing compared to other players in the SaaS space. Thanks for sharing.
Make your voice heard
Sorry, but comments are closed for this item.